Please explain why you think the mafia would choose a negative utility role and why you think this role in particular is useful to track versus say, cs’s rolefirst of all you're retarded if you think I ever no kill. the only time in my entire mafia career I've no killed was because I was the most town read person in the game and I wanted the doc to "save" me. it worked. second of all you're retarded if you think scum!me enters the thread and immediately hard busses three days in a row. third of all scum cant kill me, I'm one of like 2 possible mislynches left. fourth of all Toni is never a kill I make.
to answer a previous qurstion: I tracked drookez again because scum usually dont expect you to double track, same with how they wouldnt normally expect a double doc (and why docs almost never double target).
another qurstion: yes, I missed ds being scum without hannah because governor isnt a protective action in 95% of games. I havent really read the setup, at all.
I'll try and get to this tonight, cause I think this thread needs a good read.
anyone wanna quote why samoyed is being town read? cause when I subbed in and got my role PM, after reading 25 pages sporadically
I have both scum in four people. So I’m not going to put sam in a townpileI know why he mechanically is a poor lynch, but do you think he's mafia?
i dont know what youre askingPlease explain why you think the mafia would choose a negative utility role and why you think this role in particular is useful to track versus say, cs’s role
the game has been easy, where did i say otherwise? scum have not played wellHonestly if you’re town in drookez/cs/josh/sam this game should be very easy from your POV
I mean why would scum choose priest over other 0 roles like Neighborizer or Gladiator? It could work to try to clear a scum member?I don't almost all agree that Priest can't be scum? Do you not understand how the setup works?
But as you said, choosing priest doesn't necessarily clear anyone. So would they rather have a negative utility role (can't quick hammer) and risk the fact that they still not might be town read? Or pick a role that has some sort of benefit at 0 cost so that they can get some use out of it even if they might not be townread?Because this setup is one that always has a mass claim at some point, that's a factor in any roles scum would pick.
If I was scum, I would have picked the doublevoter most likely. I haven't done the numbers but if possible I'd get it with 4 scum, if not 3 is fine. Because, its a townie thing to claim, and a very strong power. That, or,
stop it with the wifom omgBut as you said, choosing priest doesn't necessarily clear anyone. So would they rather have a negative utility role (can't quick hammer) and risk the fact that they still not might be town read? Or pick a role that has some sort of benefit at 0 cost so that they can get some use out of it even if they might not be townread?
I agree with this post but also I still would rather lynch drookez firstI don't think that losing the ability to hammer is a big enough loss of utility to suggest that priest is a role that mafia is unlikely to take.
I also think that the possibility of a massclaim should have always been a consideration of the mafia team and considering that DS was mafia he would definately think about it.
I mean, you could think that but I still don't see why a mafia would take priest. Priest = likely town yes, but not confirmed town. There is no value to mafia in taking priest and you are giving town better roles by taking priest. As also said by moody, DS opposed claiming. In any case, if you don't buy the priest argument, please give me another convincing reason why one believe I am a good vote and I will respond accordingly.I don't think that losing the ability to hammer is a big enough loss of utility to suggest that priest is a role that mafia is unlikely to take.
I also think that the possibility of a massclaim should have always been a consideration of the mafia team and considering that DS was mafia he would definately think about it.
Give us a reads list including everyone and some reasoning, tyI mean, you could think that but I still don't see why a mafia would take priest. Priest = likely town yes, but not confirmed town. There is no value to mafia in taking priest and you are giving town better roles by taking priest. As also said by moody, DS opposed claiming. In any case, if you don't buy the priest argument, please give me another convincing reason why one believe I am a good vote and I will respond accordingly.
I'll just repeat again here that I've stood by scumread on DS.
I mean, you could think that but I still don't see why a mafia would take priest. Priest = likely town yes, but not confirmed town. There is no value to mafia in taking priest and you are giving town better roles by taking priest. As also said by moody, DS opposed claiming. In any case, if you don't buy the priest argument, please give me another convincing reason why one believe I am a good vote and I will respond accordingly.
I'll just repeat again here that I've stood by scumread on DS.
with town jalmont there is always at least one of drookez/cs/samoyed/hal on the mafia team
Drookez at least one of the above is mafia, who do you think it is and why ?