[sarcasm]Yeah, because the robber is just going to go ahead and sit around once the store owner catches up with him. "Tag, you're out!" He's not going to run. He's not going to fight back. Heck, he may have a concealed weapon with him, but he's definitely not going to use it.[/sarcasm]He shouldn't have smashed his face into the windshield. I don't sympathize with the robber, but the guy was using excessive force... That's definitely going to lose him some money if (when :/) the robber sues...
You can take someone down without smashing their head through a window.[sarcasm]Yeah, because the robber is just going to go ahead and sit around once the store owner catches up with him. "Tag, you're out!" He's not going to run. He's not going to fight back. Heck, he may have a concealed weapon with him, but he's definitely not going to use it.[/sarcasm]
Edit: Sorry if I come out like I'm insulting you in this post. I had fun writing it and might have gotten carried away. :)
I have the sudden urge to fight crime in a spiffy costume.
Well, of course you can, or you can shoot them with a STANAG magazine full of 5.56 shells or cut their hands off (lol=middle east!!!!!!!!!!!! ftw!!!). If crime occurs, it is a problem, what do you do if there is a problem? You fix the problem, by any means necessary.You can take someone down without smashing their head through a window.
It would be much worse to have your head smashed into the pavement. In fact, I'm pretty sure getting your head smashed through a windshield would do less damage than a good, solid punch to the forehead. Unless some glass got in your eyes, of course.You can take someone down without smashing their head through a window.
I think I'll take my legal advice from someone who's actually profesionally trained in criminal law / justice, thanks.MinorthreaT said:I am going to go to college to study law and I am already fairly familiar with english (read=western society) common law. Basically what he did falls under what can be paraphrased as "reasonable defense of people and property" meaning that if he has even a half-assed defense in court he'll be fine.
HAHA, agreed.All I have to say is this: Getting your face smashed into something is an occupational hazzard of being a thief.
exactly what I was going to say, same shit different pileReminds me of that case where a burglar was on the roof of a house, fell through the roof, and sued the homeowners. The burglar won the case.
You have no idea how awesome he is... If he gets sued, I will be a trifle angry about it.Well, I think your boss is fucking awesome...
I've got to say, I would not be surprised if your boss does face legal trouble. Robbing is obviously against the law, but did the robber keep the bag, or did he drop them and run? If he dropped and ran, he can make up some bullshit argument about how he was abused in the store. If he still had them, your boss could still face legal trouble, I think.
It kind of makes me think of mantrapping - if you set up your home to have some sort of alarm set off that injures someone robbing you, the burglar can sue you for the injuries and they will win.
Yeah, while I was working at Wal-Mart, we were always told that no one, not even the store's managers, have the right to lay a finger on anyone that is breaking the law in the store, with the sole exception of the loss prevention employee.I don't know that much about the legal system, but I've worked a few retail jobs and we've always been expressly forbid by company policy to ever chase a fleeing thief, and my understanding is that this is because if you do use "excessive force" they actually can bring a case against you.
Yes... if they act first. Mantrapping means you've intentionally set up something to harm anyone that may enter your house, friendly or not. That is against the law.if someone gets into your house, isn't it legal to do whatever you want to them as they trespassed? i think someone once told me as long as they're phsyically in your house, you can use any means of self defense...
Hi, here I am. Sorry I'm late.I think I'll take my legal advice from someone who's actually profesionally trained in criminal law / justice, thanks.
Is incorrect. He was stealing from the store, not the manager. The manager is not personally responsible to catch shoplifters, and 99% of companies require their employees NOT to chase a shoplifter under ANY circumstances. Even when I worked as a security guard I wasn't supposed to apprehend a person if I witnessed them committing a crime, if I did I would get fired.Surgo said:he was fucking robbing him